Monday, July 13, 2009

John Stott on the Proper Understanding of God, man, and the Atonement

I often struggle to remember the greatness of God's majesty and the ugliness of my sin for which Christ died, was buried, and rose again (Rom 5:6-11). I find in the quote by John Stott below a wonderful explanation and reminder of this truth.

"All inadequate doctrines of the atonement [i.e., the covering and removal of human sin by Jesus Christ] are due to inadequate doctrines of God and man. If we bring God down to our level and raise ourselves to his, then of course we see no need for a radical salvation, let alone for a radical atonement to secure it. When, on the other hand, we have glimpsed the blinding glory of the holiness of God, and have been so convicted of our sin by the Holy Spirit that we tremble before God and acknowledge what we are, namely 'hell-deserving sinners,' then and only then does the necessity of the cross appear so obvious that we are astonished we never saw it before.

The essential background to the cross, therefore, is a balanced understanding of the gravity of sin and the majesty of God. If we diminish either, we thereby diminish the cross. If we reinterpret sin as a lapse instead of a rebellion, and God as indulgent instead of indignant, then naturally the cross appears superfluous [i.e., unnecessary]. But to dethrone God and enthrone ourselves not only dispenses with the cross; it also degrades both God and man. A biblical view of God and ourselves, however, that is, of our sin and of God's wrath, honours both. It honours human beings by affirming them as responsible for their own actions. It honours God by affirming him as having moral character."--John Stott, The Cross of Christ (Downer's Gove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1986), 109-10.

J

2 comments:

Ched said...

Stott articulates this truth well.

A great reminder.

Anonymous said...

Great thoughts on the interconnectedness of out theology. As Systematic Theologians we can often fall into the trap of compartmentalizing our theology, thinking of each "system" as independent. Stott is always good for a profound word. Thanks as always Jonathan.