We often reaffirm this covenant around the Lord's table as a (further) reminder of the fellowship we share in Christ and the responsibilities we share toward one another as a result of this mutual union with Christ (incidentally this is a major function of the Lord's Supper that is sometimes [perhaps often] overlooked). Thus, the focus of the covenant is horizontal (i.e., on the various responsibilities each member has with respect to the corporate body) but this focus is rooted and grounded in the vertical (i.e., in the relationship with and resultant responsibilities one has before God the Father, through Christ, by the Holy Spirit).
Tonight in our care group we discussed in passing the phrase with which this post is entitled ("To contribute cheerfully and regularly to ... the relief of the poor"). This is something that I struggle to understand and fulfill...something I long to understand and fulfill. It is to this end that I write. Thus, this post has two main purposes. First, I want to share some practical reflections that K and I have had regarding this issue. Second, I would love to hear back from the other person who reads this blog as to what he or she has come to understand about this issue.
Without further ado, here is my short list of reflections: five biblical-philosophical and three practical (with some overlap):
Five biblical-philosophical observations:
- We give because everything we have has been given to us by God. “Do not be deceived, my beloved brothers. Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights with whom there is no variation or shadow due to change” (James 1:16-17 ESV). “And he said, 'Naked I came from my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return. The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD'”(Job 1:21 ESV).
- The focus of our ministry to the poor should be upon the helpless, destitute, and outcasts of our society. “Religion that is pure and undefiled before God, and the Father, is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world.”(James 1:27 ESV). Orphans and widows are quintessential examples of those upon whom we should target our care giving ministries. The able bodied hobos that line our street corners should not be the first thought in our mind when we think about the poor. Surely we must prayerfully witness and (when led by the Spirit) give to these person in wise and discerning ways (i.e., buy them food, not give them money) but they are not the main focus. How much better to aid the struggling single mother or widow or disabled person. We must be on the lookout for these sort of people. They are in desperate need of our help. Without it they will likely turn to unwholesome means of sustenance which will drag them lower and further perpetuate the cycle of poverty in their children.
- Physical inreach within our churches is a pressing need and necessary expression of our discipleship to Christ. “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another”(John 13:34-35 ESV).
- Physical outreach beyond the fellowship of the church is also a fruit of discipleship. “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me,I was naked and you clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me.’ Then the righteous will answer him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink? And when did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you? And when did we see you sick or in prison and visit you?’ And the King will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers,* you did it to me’”(Matthew 25:34-40 ESV).
- Giving is as much about attitude as it is about action. “Each one must give as he has made up his mind, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver”
(2Corinthians 9:7 ESV). Note the intentionality implied by the phrase "made up his mind." Giving isn't something that finds us it is something in which we must actively engage ourselves.
- Budget for giving. Set aside percentages of your income, food, time, etc. to give to specific areas of ministry. Remember that giving isn't just about money it's about meeting needs. Since giving is a mandate of Scripture its parameters are broad enough to include all believers rich and poor alike. Whether it's lending a helping hand, sharing canned goods, or writing a check, giving will require intentionality and planning (see #3 below).
- Target your giving. Prayerfully seek to meet the physical needs in your local church, within your local community, and globally by the leadership of the Holy Spirit.
- Locally (within the church). Why not set aside a percentage of our monthly income to give to needy couples/individuals in our own congregations? If one answers, "I don't know who the needy members of the congregation are," my suggestion is twofold. First, in the longterm, you need to become more involved in the body life of your church. If you are involved (i.e., getting to know on a personal level) members of your church within the context of a small group needs will surface. Second, in the short term you can talk to your pastor. If your pastor is shepherding the flock he will know of people within the church's fellowship who could really use some help.
- Locally (outside the church). See the note below "Globally."
- Globally. A plethora of organizations are available that can meet the needs of others globally. However, as we must always be about fulfilling the Great Commission we must not indiscriminately give our money to just any organization that meets physical needs around the world. An organization to which I recommend giving is Compassion International. It is an explicitly Christian organization that affirms the core doctrines of the faith and seeks to fulfill the Great Commission (to read their mission statement and statement of faith click here). In addition to their own testimony, Compassion has been consistently endorsed by many notable evangelical voices as a faithful and efficient hunger and educational relief arm to underprivileged, third world children. The International Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention will also sponsor hunger and disaster relief funds that missionaries draw from around the world. For more information click here. The main point I am trying to make is that we should give to organizations that truly meet physical needs but that do so with an eye toward faithfully advancing the Gospel.
- Note: While the last point is important, I do not want to reduce relief of the poor outside of the church to a $25 a month check in the mail. We need to be engaging our neighborhoods and communities with the Gospel and meeting practical everyday needs of the poor within those circles too. Admittedly this has always been my weakest area of involvement. I must further qualify this last statement by saying that all of these areas are weak in my life; so take "weakest" to be relative to the weakness of the other two (i.e., inreach and outreach-global).
- Be joyful, regular, and intentional about your giving. Set goals for giving whatever it is you've set aside to give (i.e., personal time, food, money, etc.). The mandate to give is perpetual and must be a staple of our daily, weekly, monthly activities. If we fail to discipline ourselves in this activity, we won't do it for any sustained length of time.
In Christ,
Jonathan
P.S.--Please note that this post on "giving to the poor" was written with the assumption that one is already giving his/her tithe to their local church. Supporting this presupposition goes beyond my purposes here. If you have questions about tithing, please let me know and I will be happy to discuss that at a later time.
Acknowledgments: Wes Mills led our discussion on church covenants and many of the things written in this blog were precipitated by the discussion he facilitated. Ben Arbour actually raised the particular focus question for this post and had intriguing thoughts as well. I welcome any additional thoughts or comments you may have about this subject.
7 comments:
Great thoughts, Jonathan. Here are some things I'm thinking through.
Nathan brought up the fact that conservative churches abdicated their role to society in the wake of the modernist-fundamentalist controversies, despite clarion calls from Carl F.H. Henry and others (more recently Ron Sider, and now many Emergent voices). In what ways do current political philosophies impede the missio dei of social justice through the Church?
Also, in light of your thoughts concerning outreach within the context of a local church, it occured to me how important it is for families (especially heads of the household) to overcome pride by acknowledging their needs and confiding in local church leadership. Without the humility needed to ask for help, no church body will ever be able to provide assistance.
Along a similar vein, how can "relief to the poor" be a part of the corporate witness of the C/church to society at large? In what ways can social justice testify to the world that we exist because we love Jesus Christ, and because He first loved us? And lastly, how do we balance the possiblity of such evangelistic implications of social justice with Paul's mandate in Galatians 6:10: "So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone, and especially those who are of the household of faith"?
Ben, great thoughts. Here are some responses I have to your questions.
1. The socialistic tendencies of our current political philosophical climate and practice are an impediment to the church's participation in social justice and ministry because it places government in the driver's seat of this ministry instead of the church. Unfortunately that is a situation the church has complacently stood by and allowed to happen. However, I don't think that churches can rightfully say that they are impeded in this ministry. If local bodies of believers were to get serious about this kind of ministry and focus their collective efforts at this problem the trend to "governmentalize" everything could be reversed. The government can't compete with volunteer ministry when it is manned by people with a heart and passion for the work (economically or qualitatively). In short, while our dominant political philosophies are friendly to the church's role in social justice this shouldn't be used as an excuse for why we aren't more involved. Do you think the churches were forced out of their social justice roles or that they abdicated them?
2. Your second paragraph says it all. Being a part of the body of Christ means reaching for help as much as reaching out to help. If we didn't need others there wouldn't be a church in the first place.
3. I think your third question is right on the money. As we reach out to meet the tangible needs of people they see a visible representation of God's love. It qualifies the voice of our verbal witness to Christ. While we must not confuse social ministry with evangelism, neither should we make them antithetical. If we love people we will declare the Gospel with both our words and actions. I don't know about you but I struggle to muster up the desire to do door-to-door witnessing. I'm not saying it's wrong or that we shouldn't do it, only that it isn't very natural. However, when I've been able to help someone with a need the door to speak to them about the Gospel has been wide open. It seems we would see a greater number of quality witnessing opportunities if we were to focus on this kind of ministry with an eye toward sharing the Gospel.
Jonathan,
As always, your eloquent words pierce the heart and make one weep with the joy of greater understanding of the most profound mysteries of life. :-) Now that your ego is properly inflated I would like to make a few observations.
1. While all of your points are profound and a needed reminder in the church, I found points one and two to be particularly well said. Our first step as believers is to recognize our calling to serve “the least of these,” through all of the resources God has blessed us with. This allows for a tangable recognition that what we have is God’s and God’s alone.
Concerning your second point, you are correct to point our that too often our giving is determined my ease or comfort rather than need. It’s easy for us to hand a $5 bill to the guy on the street corner, but infinitely more difficult to go to a bettered woman’s shelter to serve. It’s easier to write a check to this month’s charity at the office than it is visiting a childless widow in hospice care. Thanks for your great observations. I know that I pray for the strength to be better at applying these truths.
2. I would like to throw out some observation when it comes to giving and would appreciate any feedback:
a. When it comes to giving our first concern should be in the result of the giving rather than in the intention. We see this on a small scale with the afore mentioned $5 bill given to the gentlemen at the street corner carrying the prerequisite cardboard sign. While giving him the $5 bill may be considered kind, and may make you feel good about yourself, the results could be disastrous (alcohol, drugs, etc) and could perpetuate his cycle of poverty. We see this on a large scale when US charities take donations of clothes here in the US to send over to impoverished African nations. Again this seems to be a kind gesture and gives the giver a warm and fuzzy feeling inside (though I suspect it has more to do with what they had for lunch). However the result of the influx of free and used clothing results in the collapse of textile markets throughout this already impoverished country, creating more hungry mouths to feed. We must consider the results of our giving more so than the intentions.
b. Giving is best when it is personal. This is why state mandated solutions to poverty never work. The giver (i.e the tax payer) has no personal connection to the one receiving the charity. Often they do not even notice the money they have “given” is gone or what their money is going to. However when a person takes personal responsibility for the welfare of others the giving is often greater because the success and failures are right before the givers eyes. Then charity and giving is about people rather than programs and demographics. Of course we can do more cooperatively (local churches, denominations, economically responsible charities, etc) but all of these still maintain some level of personal connection. There is a profound difference between welfare and charity.
c. Some recourses on “Effective Compassion”
• www.acton.org
• Marvin Olasky’s “The Tragedy of American Compassion”
• Thomas Sowell’s “Economic Facts and Fallacies”
• Samule Gregg’s “The Commercial Society”
Thanks for the opportunity to take up lots of space on your blog page. Have a great weekend.
Joe
Joe, your political awareness is always appreciated. I have to admit I haven't thought through 2a before. Yet another reason why I need to read the newspaper and be abreast of current events. Your second point about giving needing to be personal is dead on. Question: "How do we guard against the pride of giving (i.e., giving of the personal nature you mention)?"
Jonathan, here are some thoughts in response to your question, "Do you think the churches were forced out of their social justice roles or that they abdicated them?"
Maybe a little of both. I agree with you that churches cannot rightfully say that they are impeded in social justice ministry - except that Christians have to pay taxes!
Entitlement spending in government is out of control - largely because of red tape and enormous beaurocracies. Of the tax dollars that we pay which are allocated to entitlement programs, less than 50%actually gets there. Compare this with Compassion International, in which 97% of the funds arrive at the intended destination (the children), or even a secular charity United Way, which boasted an amazing 93% rate, even in the midst of a scandal in which exectuives were being highly overcompensated!
There is only so much money to go around. I know Americans are incredibly wealthy, and that we could, if we wanted, make additional sacrifices. All I'm saying is that the relief of the poor could be accomplished much more effectively through local churches than it can through government (as Joe pointed out), and that, were government to give money back to Christians who would in turn give the same amount of money to Christian organizations, the money would go a lot farther. Maybe government should privitize entitlement programs.
I think your idea has merit. Privatization seems to be a better solution for numerous issues as opposed to big government. Nonetheless, as you alluded to we need to begin taking our responsibility seriously regardless of governmental or tax structuring.
My comment won't be as lengthy or filled with as nice of verbage as the others. I think the core problem we have as a nation is consumerism. This leads to an abundance of debt. While our hearts desire to do good, our butts keep the money in place. I run across alot of individuals who are not freed to do what God ask because of financal debt. I belive as a whole if this is addressed, more people will be freed up to follow God's leading, even to the extent of eliminating poverty within communities.
Post a Comment